On March 13, human rights activist Tolekan Ismailova was taken in for questioning by officers from the Bishkek City Main Internal Affairs Directorate.
The day before, it became known that a pre-investigative check was being conducted in connection with posts on the Facebook account “Tolekan Ismailova,” which, according to law enforcement agencies, could have caused a “negative reaction from users.” However, the specific post that prompted the complaints was not specified.
Responding to investigators’ questions about the content of her posts, she explained: “I post against war and in support of peace and development,” and also shares materials demanding “the restoration of citizens’ constitutional rights and the fulfillment by the authorities of their obligations regarding human rights and freedoms.”
During the interrogation, the investigator also asked questions about the activities of the organization she heads, Bir Duino—Kyrgyzstan, its funding, and the issues the organization addresses.
The interrogation took place on the day that human rights defenders and activists, including Bermet Borubaeva, planned to hold a peaceful gathering outside the administration of Bishkek’s Pervomaisky District in protest against the ongoing ban on rallies in the city’s central areas.
Restrictions on holding peaceful assemblies in this district of Bishkek have been regularly extended for several years now. Human rights defenders view such measures, as well as summoning activists for questioning on the eve of protests, as forms of pressure aimed at restricting freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly.
Summoning activists for questioning immediately before planned peaceful assemblies creates a chilling effect and may be viewed as interference with the right to peaceful protest or as intimidation.
In light of the above, we declare:
Pressure on human rights defenders and activists is unacceptable. Interrogations, summonses, and other procedural actions must not be used as a tool for intimidation or to prevent peaceful civic engagement.
Any procedural actions must be carried out in strict compliance with protocol, including the issuance of an official summons and an explanation of the reasons for detention.
Freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of expression are the foundation of a democratic society; restrictions on these rights are permissible only in cases established by law (protection of national security, public order, health, and the rights of others) and for a clearly defined period of time.
The state is obligated to ensure freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly in accordance with international standards, including the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Supported by:
- Center for Civil Liberties
- Human Rights Center ZMINA (Ukraine)
- Iulia Kharashvili, IDPWA Consen
- Norwegian Helsinki Committee
- Netherlands Helsinki Committee
- Crude Accountability
- Human Rights Center Viasna (Belarus)
- KRF Public Alternative
- Human Rights House Foundation
- Sphere Foundation
- Public Association “Dignity”
- Freedom Files
- Turkmen Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights
- Office of Civil Freedoms
- Human Rights Center (HRC)
- Center for Participation and Development
- HCA Vanadzor
- International Partnership for Human Rights
- Protection of Rights without Borders
- Legal Policy Research Centre
- Kazakhstan International Bureau for Human Rights and Rule of Law
- Minority Rights Group
- Human Rights Club
- Human Rights Defense Center Memorial
- Coalition for Civil Liberties and Rights (CILD)
- Institute Respublica
- International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), within the framework of the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders
- World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), within the framework of the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders